Hi sander,
Now we are getting to the crux of something that has my interest.
What you termed "heavy" or "light" persistance.
It seems a full and ideal LSA++ would require heavy persistance. Right? As with the three aDSO's in my simple example above.
This would be more costly BW on HANA. (Without dynamic tiering or archiving).
Is it fair to say this?
As you summarised in your last paragraph, and what I am beginning to understand, trying to articulate the LSA++ is subjective to a companies architecture and policies.
I'm not sure if that is a good thing. I think the industry needs solid examples and not too much freedom to interpret the LSA++, otherwise it will defeat its own, BW structureded and flexible, objectives. Jon and anyone else, what do you think